A quantitative assessment of facial protection systems in elective hip arthroplasty


Published online: Jun 27 2011

Kieran Michael Hirpara, Emily O'Halloran, Michael O'Sullivan

Study performed at Merlin Park Hospital, Galway, Ireland

Abstract

We aimed to assess the risk to surgeons of blood splatter during total hip arthroplasty. Hoods from personal protection systems used in 34 consecutive total hip replacements were collected and the area of blood splatter was measured and compared to goggles and visors. Thirty one primary THA's (13 cemented, 4 hybrid, 14 uncemented) and 3 revisions (1 hybrid, 2 uncemented) were collected. Splashes were detected on all of the masks with a mean of 0.34% cover. Splatter was greatest for the operating surgeon, followed by the first assistant, though the difference was not statistically significant. Operating personnel were at greater risk of contamination during uncemented arthroplasty (p < 0.0001 ; 95% CI). On average 50.60% and 45.40% of blood cover was outside the area protected by goggles and visors respectively. There was a significant difference between the Personal Protection Systems (PPS) and goggles (p?=?0.0231?; 95% CI) as well as between the PPS and visors (p = 0.0293 ; 95% CI).