Abstract

Patellar and femoral component in total knee arthroplasty are inextricably linked as a functional unit. The configuration of this unit has been a matter of ongoing debate, and the myriad of different patellar and femoral components currently available reflect the lack of consensus with respect to the ideal design. One of the major challenges is to overcome the biomechanical disadvantages of a small contact area through which high contact pressures are transferred, making this mechanical construct the weakest part of the prosthetic knee. Contact areas are highly dependent on the congruency of the patellofemoral joint articulation, and are significantly smaller for dome shaped patellar components compared to those of more anatomic designs. However, when exposed to 3-dimensional movements, the contact areas of the dome shaped patella are significantly greater, indicating enhanced forgiveness regarding patellar malpositioning. Although contact stresses, a function of implant design and surface conformity, can reach levels far beyond the yield strength of UHMWPE, catastrophic failure of resurfaced patellar components, commonly seen in metal backed patellae, fashionable in the 1980s, has rarely been observed since. Although plastic deformation and wear of UHMWPE continue to represent a problem, in the absence of suitable alternatives polyethylene remains the bearing surface of choice. The appreciation of the consequences of the mechanical environment on the behaviour of the patellofemoral joint is of particular importance in the endeavour to develop knee replacement systems which provide satisfactory function together with clinical long-term success.