Safe zones in dorsal portals for wrist arthroscopy: a cadaveric study

Keywords:

wrist arthroscopy, dorsal portals, safe zones


Published online: Apr 23 2024

https://doi.org/10.52628/90.1.11149

G. ANTONOGLOU1,2, G. PAPATHANAKOS3, A. VRETTAKOS2, A. KITSOULI1, D.N. VARVAROUSIS1, A. KEFALAS4, G. PARASKEVAS5

1 Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
2 Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “Agios Pavlos”, Thessaloniki, Greece
3 Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
4 Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
5 Laboratory of Anatomy and Anatomy of Surgery, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

The standard dorsal portals are the most commonly used in wrist arthroscopy. This cadaveric study aims to determine safe zones, by quantitatively describing the neurovascular relationships of the dorsal wrist arthroscopy portals: 1-2, 3-4, midcarpal radial, midcarpal ulnar, 4-5, 6-radial and 6-ulnar. The neurovascular structures of twenty-one fresh frozen human cadaveric upper limbs were exposed, while the aforementioned portals were established with needles through portal sites. The minimum distance between portals and: dorsal carpal branch of radial artery, superficial branch of radial nerve, posterior interosseous nerve and dorsal branch of ulnar nerve, were measured accordingly with a digital caliper, followed by statistical analysis of the data. The median and interquartile range for each portal to structures at risk were determined and a safe zone around each portal was established. Free of any neurovascular structure safe zones surrounding 1-2, 3-4, midcarpal radial, midcarpal ulnar, 4-5, 6-radial and 6-ulnar portals were found at 0.46mm, 2.33mm, 10.73mm, 11.01mm, 10.38mm, 5.95mm and 0.64mm respectively. Results of statistical analysis from comparisons between 1-2, 3-4 and midcarpal radial portals, indicated that 1-2 was the least safe. The same analysis among 3-4, midcarpal radial, midcarpal ulnar and 4-5 portals indicated that midcarpal portals were safer, while 3-4 was the least safe. Results among midcarpal ulnar, 4-5, 6-radial and 6-ulnar portals indicated that 6-radial and specifically 6-ulnar were the least safe. This study provides a safe approach to the dorsal aspect of the wrist, enhancing established measurements and further examining safety of the posterior interosseous nerve.