Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures : A comparison of two implant designs


Published online: Apr 27 2012

Philip WINNOCK DE GRAVE, Thomas TAMPERE, Pieter BYN, John VAN OVERSCHELDE, Christophe PATTYN, René VERDONK

Philip WINNOCK DE GRAVE, Thomas TAMPERE, Pieter BYN, John VAN OVERSCHELDE, Christophe PATTYN, René VERDONK

Abstract

We report the results of a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the Gamma 3 nail with the ACE trochanteric nail for the treatment of pertrochanteric femoral fractures. One hundred and twelve consecutive patients were enrolled in the study : 61 patients were treated with the Gamma 3 nail, 51 with the ACE trochanteric nail. The two groups were matched for age, fracture type and preoperative Merle d'Aubigné hip score. All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically on a regular basis between 6 weeks and one year postoperatively. Twenty-six patients (23%) died within the first postoperative year. Six patients were lost to follow-up. In each group, two patients were revised due to mechanical failure. Nonunion did not occur. The mean postoperative hip scores in the Gamma 3 and the ACE group were 14.19 and 14.12 respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.92). Walking ability was adequately restored in approximately 80% of the patients. Both implants appeared as safe and effective methods of treatment for intertrochanteric hip fractures.